EDITORIAL & REVIEW POLICY
Clear sources. Honest limits.
Our editorial standard is to make a page useful without presenting belief, marketing, or uncertainty as established fact.
Different claims need different treatment
We describe spiritual traditions as beliefs or interpretive practices. Checkable statements about history, science, health, law, or service terms should be supported by suitable sources and framed within what those sources actually establish.
Personal testimony can describe someone’s experience; it cannot independently demonstrate psychic accuracy, medical effectiveness, or a guaranteed future outcome. We avoid fabricated experts, unsupported credentials, invented testimonials, and claims of testing that did not occur.
How to read our reviews and listings
A review should identify its scope, the date of any checked information, and whether it is based on hands-on use, published provider information, or another disclosed method. We do not claim that every provider has been independently tested.
Third-party ratings and listings must be identified as such. Commercial compensation should be disclosed near relevant content. Claims such as “best,” “top,” or “accurate” require a clear basis and should not imply a scientific assessment.
AI-assisted material
AI-assisted drafting, editing, or imagery may be used on this site. AI output is not a source, expert qualification, or proof of a claim. Generated imagery is illustrative unless explicitly documented otherwise; it must not be presented as a real testimonial, real staff portrait, or evidence of a supernatural event.
We do not represent automated output or an installed tool as professional review. Readers should be told when the basis of a material claim or review is limited.
Older articles and corrections
This library includes historical material. A page remaining available does not mean every claim has been verified. Older articles can be revised, contextualized, or excluded from search indexing when they are outdated, duplicative, or insufficiently supported.
Report a problem through Contact, including the URL, the exact concern, and a reliable source if available. Corrections should address the claim itself rather than merely adding a generic disclaimer.
Comments and safety
Reader comments express individual views. They are not verified customer reviews or evidence of accuracy. Moderation may address spam, abusive language, private information, or harmful claims. Do not rely on comments for professional advice.
Content must not encourage stopping treatment, paying to remove an alleged curse, coercing another person’s feelings, or replacing qualified help in a crisis. See the disclaimer and safety guide.